-
Hello Cosmos obsessors!
I am working on an article about time of body at speed of light.Then, I realized that I should take review on my article’s idea
My article’s title name which I decided is ” End of time= infinite mass”
In this article I would share my thoughts about the time for body at the speed of light.One day I was just wandering my thoughts then I came suddenly two equations came infront of my eyes in imagination
Then I combine them and the result was shocking 😲
It was the equations
→E=mc^2
and the other one was
→E = hf
We know that
f= 1/t
Then by combining both of those equation I got
t=h/mc^2………….(1)Then when I put my thoughts into equations the thoughts and equation result was same .
I think this way that as body speed of the body increases its mass increases till at the certain point it will be infinite then at that moment the body will be out of time mean body of infinite mass experience no time _no past , no present,no futureWhen I put the infinite mass in my equation then I got
t = h / (∞)
t=0If we think other way that if the universe is infinite then what will its time ? Equation shows that time will zero .Then, now question is what is time ? What we experience? It’s just an illusion?
I’d love to hear your thoughts and arguments on this! Tell me what you think.
1 Comment
The article is thought-provoking and raises interesting questions about time, mass, and extreme physical limits. However, it has important scientific weaknesses.
The main issue is that it mixes equations from different contexts.
E = mc² applies to massive objects, while E = hf applies to photons. Equating them directly is not physically valid, so the derived equation t = h / (mc²) is not a real law of physics.
The article also relies on the outdated idea of relativistic mass increasing to infinity. In modern physics, mass remains constant; it is energy that becomes infinite as an object approaches the speed of light.
In relativity, time slows down but never becomes zero for objects with mass. For light, time is undefined not zero.
The conclusion that an infinite universe must have zero time is therefore philosophical, not scientific.
Overall:
The idea works well as a philosophical thought experiment, but it should not be presented as a mathematical or physical proof.